Still With a Major High Street Bank?

It’s been about eight years now since I ditched the bunch of muppets at Lloyds TSB in favour of Smile, the Internet bank from the Co-operative. Quite apart from their ethical banking policy, they offer decent rates on their accounts, and more than that running the account is a minimum of hassle.

Tonight, Watchdog on the BBC published the results of their recent banking survey, which showed that my decision of eight years ago was a good one now, with Smile in second place, just piped at the post by First Direct, another internet based bank.

What was interesting to note was the big names down at the bottom of the table, my former bank Lloyds TSB was right down there – ironic considering the comment of the manager at Rickmansworth when I closed my Lloyds TSB account that he hoped to tempt me back – along with the Halifax and Bank of Scotland, and award for the worst bank of all going to the Abbey.

However, the detail of the figures is what makes interesting reading, so for example the banks that did well had most voters saying that they hadn’t had need to complain, and those that did found problems easily resolved by the bank. In comparison the banks that did poorly had larger numbers of complaints, and it was more of a problem to solve.

In the past it has been reported that people didn’t change banks because they thought it was a hassle – it is perhaps pleasing to see that only ten percent of respondents to this survey believe this. Certainly even eight years ago it was relatively straightforward for me to switch, and the problems there were came down to Lloyds TSB incompetence rather than Smile. The biggest reason for non-switching now seems to be that people think they won’t get better service elsewhere – based on the results of the survey, if they are with one of the big banks in the bottom five this is untrue. When you look at the massive numbers of people who have been with the same bank for years – almost two-thirds for ten or more years, you realise that the big banks essentially rely on the apathy of the vast majority of their customers to make them money. They hit their customers with big charges, pay miserly interest rates and offer us lousy customer service because they know that the vast majority of people won’t bother to move, because they either think the other banks will be the same, or they think it’s too much hassle.

Certainly I’ll disagree. I’ll happily recommend Smile, the accounts have run without a major hitch for years. The most recent time I had to call customer service was actually to unpick my screw up, rather than something they’d done, but they were really helpful and apologetic that they couldn’t be more help, despite it being my fault. On top of that they have a current account that pays almost thirty times the interest of some of the major banks on my whole balance rather than just part of it (check out the small print on some of the competition), and doesn’t hammer me when I go overdrawn either. The changeover is not too bad either – with Smile it’s one form to fill in, and then a month or so of keeping an eye on the old bank to make sure they do their part in switching you over. So, if you’re still with a high street bank, and dissatisfied with their service, why not vote with your feet and take your business elsewhere?

Ashes to Ashes

240px-ashes_to_ashes.jpg

Ashes to Ashes was born out of the nightmare of TV producers everywhere, the unexpected commission. Probably the most famous example of that is the fourth series of Blakes 7, where the production team had believed that the third series was to be the last, blown up the Liberator, tied up loose ends, and the production office had closed. The first most of them knew about a fourth series was when the continuity voice-over over the closing credits announced that the series would return the next year. Other examples include the rushed conclusion of season four and slow pace of season five of Babylon 5 as a result of a very late renewal for the fifth season. The key problem in all those situations is that the writers and producers generally aren’t prepared, or at least their plans tend to have to be changed at short notice – more often than not the result is regarded as not nearly so good – Blakes 7 built new sets, new props and a slightly changed concept, and was axed after only another season. Babylon 5 always was going to end after season five, but the final season is regarded by many as a disappointment.

With Ashes to Ashes, during the closing weeks of production on Life on Mars, after the news that John Simm wanted to stop, and with the final story written and in production, the BBC requested that the producers find some way to reuse the characters. At a late stage the scene in the final Life on Mars where Sam produces a report of his experiences was inserted, and the idea of having another police officer end up in a similar world was created.

Certainly, it is fair to say that I wasn’t keen on the idea – whilst the final episode of Life on Mars, which although I thought was left fairly open clearly pointed to it being something related to Sam, I really couldn’t see how you could drop another person in to that. If the characters were to be the same people that Sam had met you were starting to stray into more sci-fi territory.

Having said that, the situation was largely as a result of trying to find a vehicle for the characters, and the unwillingness of people like John Simm to continue. Whilst the linking of the series might be a bit of a problem, I certainly was still going to watch Ashes to Ashes.

So at the end of last week, we sat down to watch Ashes to Ashes. I have to say that my comment that it is nothing more than a rehash of Life on Mars is pretty well spot on. There may be a bit of a changed dynamic in having a woman in the Sam role, and some changes in that she knows about Sam’s experiences and strongly believes she is in a coma, essentially this is the same basic plot, even down to having links between present day events and the era in which Alex Drake arrives.

However, don’t conclude that because it’s a clone, it’s not any good. Even though you can draw clear parallels with Life on Mars, it was still a fairly entertaining watch. True it doesn’t have the originality, and not the same level of mystery as to what is going on that you had before, but with the much loved trio of Gene Hunt, Ray Carling and Chris Skelton, and a different selection of nostalgic pop culture references, you felt right at home.

It certainly goes to show that you don’t necessarily need originality to produce entertaining TV – it just remains to see if stripped of the originality and the mystery elements of the original series there will be enough to keep the interest of the audience longer term, and take it beyond being a shadowy clone of Life on Mars.

Finding Out the Secret

275px-torchwood_meat.jpg

There is a plot device much beloved of writers, which is to have a character that doesn’t know some big secret, a secret which the audience is in on. More often than not it’s some long suffering partner or potential partner – Lois Lane in Superman, or Mary Jane Watson in Spiderman being prime examples. The problem is that sooner or later the audience starts to wonder why it is that this character hasn’t spotted, for example, the remarkable similarity between the guy in the fancy costume and their co-worker in the glasses. Either that, or the character is deliberately made out to not be all that bright in order to explain how they have missed something so obvious. The problem is for the writer though is that the longer it goes on, the more unsympathetic the audience will become to the character, and something has to be done to deal with the problem.

Since it started, Torchwood has had just such a secret, and just such a person, with Rhys long suffering boyfriend of Gwen Cooper, who until this week had totally failed to find out what his girlfriend actually did for a job – this despite most of the rest of the local population seeming to know about Torchwood. As a character he was very much falling into the not very bright category…

Russell T has stated that at the end of series one, that had originally intended to kill Rhys off, which is one of the traditional ways out of the situation. However, they had a change of heart, and what they did instead was this weeks episode of Torchwood where Rhys blunders into the middle of a Torchwood investigation, and at the end of the episode Gwen refuses to carry out the order to wipe his memory of what has happened, directly disobeying Jack in front of the rest of the team.

The actual investigation was into some decidedly dodgy meat that Rhys and his transport company were shipping and that was being cut from a large alien whale type thing being kept in a warehouse. Having said that, plot-wise, it seemed to generally be secondary to the need to bring Rhys in on the secret, and also open up the potential future conflicts with Jack and probably some issues with Gwen behaving differently with any investigation where Rhys is at risk – both of which came up in this episode.

It is always a risky move altering the relationships between characters, sometimes it works, other times it doesn’t. For an example of how things can spectacularly nose-dive, just look no further than what happened with Lois and Clark when the secret came out… The big difference with that though is that the relationship was at the heart of the story – here, the Rhys/Gwen dynamic is secondary, and hopefully will be used to focus on tensions and issues within the team.

In terms of how the series is shaping up, it perhaps wasn’t the best episode – but it is certainly kept my interest, and does seem to be keeping up the standards set in the past couple of weeks, hopefully boding well for the rest of the season.

Famous last words…

A Day in Oxford

Under the Tower

This morning we were up rather early for a Saturday in order to catch a train at Wokingham station, heading off to Oxford for the inaugural Affirming Liberalism conference. Even taking into account the annoying sitting around on Reading station that any trip to Oxford involves, thanks to the chaotic situation traffic wise in the city, much as with London, it is still much easier and quicker to go by train.

The conference was being held in Trinity College, which is one of the smaller of the colleges and sits between the much more popular Balliol College on one side, and “Mr Blackwell’s shopâ€? – part of which is beneath one of the Trinity College quadrangles. The reason for the selection was that it had a nice little lecture theatre suitable for the expected sixty or so people. However since one hundred and forty people had booked, and we even had some people waiting outside to see if there were any people that didn’t turn up so they could get in, it proved to be a little small!

The initial idea, since there were now too many people for the lecture theatre was to have a video link-up between two adjacent lecture theatres. Unfortunately the technology failed on the day, so what happened in the end was that each speaker did their session twice, swapping between lecture theatres for the afternoon session.

We were in the main lecture theatre, so had Revd Dr Mark Chapman speaking about “Reclaiming Liberal Christianity� in the morning, and Revd Canon Professor Keith Ward speaking about “Why the Future Belongs to Liberal Religion� in the afternoon.

I have to say, that from my point of view, and especially on a Saturday morning, Mark Chapman’s session was pretty hard going. A lot of his session was talking about some of the history, in particular a lot of Victorian Church history, leading towards a look at where we are now. Thankfully he has written out his lecture, so it will be possible to work through what he has said in some detail once that has been published to the Affirming Liberalism site.

The afternoon session with Keith Ward was certainly more accessible from my point of view. Keith focused on seven points in his lecture – his proposition being that every single Christian should agree with some, or indeed all of them. Again, the content of the lecture will be published to the Affirming Liberalism site, so I won’t try and recap it all here.

In between the two sessions we had a service in the College Chapel, and a fantastic lunch – which served venison alongside a chicken and a fish dish. Interestingly, most people seemed to be going for the venison – I assume for a similar reason to me in that you don’t often see it on a menu!

Beth Finds the Shakespeare Department

We also took a walk next door during the lunch break, taking in “Mr Blackwell’s shopâ€?, where we took a look at the three miles of books downstairs, and also Beth had a real English Teacher moment when she discovered that the shop actually has a Shakespeare department!

The day seemed to be very well received amongst the attendees, with many looking forward to the next meeting. We had good support from across the Diocese and beyond (attendees from as far afield as Wales and Essex), and with the Bishop of Oxford himself putting in an appearance, and asking Professor Ward a difficult question or two. I’ve uploaded pictures taken during the day to Flickr, and will link to the transcripts of the sessions once these have been posted.

The Gratuitous Vote for Me Posting

I’ve signed up for Fuel My Blog which is basically a bloggers community, which a couple of other bloggers whose blogs I read have signed up to.

Anyway, along with discussion forums and other stuff they also have recommendations for blogs, and the ability for people to vote for favourites, so I’ve added a vote link to the side of the page, and another link on this post, and this is the entirely gratuitous vote for me posting. 😀

Feel free to click the vote button or the picture on this posting and vote away…