iPad v Kindle – No Competition?

Earlier in the year when the iPad was announced and released, and with Apple struggling to fulfil demand, people were writing the Kindle off – another device that had got to market first and been beaten by Apple.

Strange as it may seem when the brand name iPod is interchangeable with MP3 player, there was a time when Apple wasn’t in the MP3 player market, indeed many pundits thought they were nuts to produce one (these are the same pundits who thought they were nuts to produce a smartphone, and nuts to produce a tablet PC of course), but produce one they did, and the rest is, as they say, history.

Pundits could clearly see the Kindle going the same way. Amazon had produced a Kindle application for the iPad and iPhone, and it almost seemed like admitting defeat.

Roll forward a few months and everything is looking a bit different. Amazon have released the next generation Kindle, and much like the iPad before it, they are again selling as fast as they can be produced.

It is an attractive package.

For a fraction of the cost of an iPad – the most expensive Kindle is only £149, less than half the price of the cheapest iPad, and a fifth of the going rate for the most expensive 64Gb 3G iPad – Amazon have produced a smaller, lighter device with an amazing claimed battery life of a month, throwing in free 3G international data, and even a web browser. Not surprisingly the pundits are now suggesting that the Kindle is ready to trounce the iPad, lining the two devices up for a competition.

But is there really a competition?

When you look at the Kindle, yes it may have a built in browser, but it is a very limited and basic browser – about enough to check your e-mail. Providing free 3G for full scale web browsing is clearly not the intention, and to be honest is not something Amazon could afford for any length of time. Quite apart from that, I doubt anybody would accept browsing in black and white these days. This is clearly a device built primarily for reading text, and as such with a fantastic e-Ink screen it’s ideal.

Whilst yes, the iPad has iBooks, and Steve Jobs made a big thing about it at launch, the iPad is not just an eBook reader. Yes you can use it as that, but you’re seriously underusing the device. The powerful processor and colour screen offer much more flexibility and power, so you can do things with books that a Kindle cannot – check out the Alice in Wonderland or Cat in the Hat apps in the app store for example. The Kindle can’t play games like the ever popular Angry Birds. You haven’t got an equivalent of iWork, Photoshop or any of the other popular apps. You’re not going to be able to watch a movie on a Kindle.

So there you have it no competition. Or should that be no competition? The two devices are pitching at totally different markets, the competition is entirely artificial. The iPad is much more of a general purpose device that just happens to be able to show eBooks. The Kindle on the other hand is a device designed primarily to read text, and does it fantastically well.

If you’re wanting to just read books, the choice is clear, don’t waste your money on an iPad, I’d be heading for the Kindle. If you’re wanting a more general purpose tablet device, get yourself an iPad, and thanks to the free Amazon app you can read your Kindle books on that too.

Kindles are available exclusively from Amazon, with iPads available from a number of stores both bricks and mortar and online. The links below will take you to the relevant pages on Amazon, and purchasing through these will help with the costs of running this site.

[ad#Kindle Wi-Fi][ad#Kindle 3G][ad#iPad 16Gb][ad#iPad 32Gb 3G][ad#iPad 64Gb 3G]

Calling All Zingzilla Fans

Sat watching Zingzillas this morning, a show that Lucy really enjoys on CBeebies, Beth again wondered out loud whether they were going to release any music from the series, as it does seem pretty popular, and we know a number of children aside from our own who like the songs.

So as I do, I did a search and by a strange coincidence they do! As of today an EP with two songs from the series – Do You Didgeridoo? and Bhangra Beat – and the Zingzillas Theme Tune was released and is available from Amazon and other online music stores with a Zingzillas DVD available in time for Christmas. Suffice to say that the MP3’s are already downloaded and I’m sure someone will be getting a copy of the DVD in their stocking come Christmas!

Note, although you could buy it elsewhere, if you buy from the links below, Amazon make a little contribution towards paying our hosting costs for this site.

[ad#Zingzillas MP3][ad#Zingzillas DVD]

Is This Defending the NHS?

During his time as Tory leader in opposition, David Cameron has been at pains to portray his party as the party of the NHS pledging to protect and increase spending on the British health service. Alongside that he highlights how he is a proud user of the service – his most recent child being born at an NHS hospital, his other children having been treated by the NHS. Coming into government, the talk so far has been of saving money by cutting back on bureaucracy, reducing management but leaving front line services in tact. However the inadvertent leak and subsequent official confirmation of the scrapping of NHS Direct calls that promise into question, or at least the Tory definition of a front line service. The Liberal Democrats similarly made a commitment not to cut front line services, so again, is this Nick Clegg (@nick_clegg) breaking a promise, or again do the Liberal Democrats have a different definition of a front line service?

What is even more galling about the whole announcement is that when you read the detail, they aren’t phasing out the nurse led medical helpline across the whole country. NHS24 and NHS Direct Wales the Scottish and Welsh versions of NHS Direct are continuing, it’s only in England that the nurse led helpline is being dropped in favour of the new NHS 111 service, a service where the staff on the phone will have sixty hours of training rather than nurses who have been through the same degree and level training as any other nurse working in the country. Essentially the English are being palmed off with a cut price imitation, whilst other parts of the UK continue with the full service.

It’s not as if this isn’t a popular service, it handles calls from 14,000 people a day and has been estimated to have saved other parts of the service hundreds of millions of pounds. Certainly on the occasions we’ve used it the choice was to phone NHS Direct, or pack the kids into the car for a trip to the local Accident and Emergency department. We have an out of hours GP service, but that is run by one person and when we have called it we have often had to wait a good while for a call to be returned. NHS Direct have always been a lot quicker in responding, and in a couple of situations where in the early hours of the morning we have been worried about a sick child have given us clear advice and saved us a trip to casualty. They’ve also given Beth advice when she was concerned over drug combinations when she has both been pregnant and also breast feeding – all advice that a telephonist with sixty hours training would not be allowed or qualified to give, and that the out of hours GP would just be too busy to provide. It seems doubtful if a call centre of primarily operators with a much reduced number of professional medical staff will be able to give the same level of service and support that for over ten years the English public have been getting, and the Scottish and Welsh public will continue to receive.

Following the announcement, discussion on Twitter has been taking place under the #savenhsdirect hash tag, and there is already a petition launched at http://www.savenhsdirect.co.uk/ – and there is already speculation that this change might go the way of the abolition of free school milk which was announced and then swiftly U-turned. It’s pretty clear that the axing of NHS Direct wasn’t intended to be announced just yet, so maybe we’ll have Andrew Lansley to thank in a few months for making another goof in letting the cat out of the bag so soon, and giving the Save NHS Direct campaign a chance to get going sooner rather than later!

Interregnum

St James'At St James’ we’re now officially in what used to be called an interregnum, but is now somewhat more boringly, (although accurately if you know your Latin) called a vacancy. Although his final service was at the end of July, Rev’d Richard our Priest-in-Charge for the last six years didn’t officially stand down until now, and was nominally still in charge, but now we’re on our own for at least the next few months, probably a year.

The interregnum is always a bit of a difficult and uncertain time for those left behind, especially when a church has experienced a lot of growth under an incumbent just departed. There is always the concern that people were coming because of a personal connection – a connection that goes with the departure of a popular priest. To some extent we won’t know whether that is the case until we’ve looked at the attendance figures a few months down the line. Certainly there were a couple of people who rushed to get services done before Rev’d Richard left, and I have had conversations with other people who are more on the periphery of the congregation who are less inclined to come without Rev’d Richard there, but at the moment I’m fairly hopeful that as a result of having a large team leading services and our popular NSM Rev’d John still very much on the scene things should continue as before.

There is also a big fear of change amongst many, which often manifests itself as a desire to not change anything for however long the interregnum lasts. Obviously that isn’t going to happen for a number of reasons. Firstly going from having a full time incumbent to running a parish such as ours with no full time staff – the duties of the incumbent get split between our part time NSM and the Churchwardens mainly – it is inevitable that you can’t run things the same. It is also in my opinion unhealthy to try and resist change. Like any organisation a church is in a continual state of change different characters in different roles, even down to the people turning up to services affect how the organisation operates in a wide spectrum of ways. Rev’d John is a different person that Rev’d Richard, and whilst we’ll continue with the service pattern as before, he will obviously do things subtly differently. In actual fact it took all of a week after Rev’d Richard’s last service before I had a “I don’t like the way this place is going” conversation with somebody! The church community doesn’t just wrap itself up in bubble-wrap until the new Rector comes along, obviously you can’t decide to kick out the choir and the organ and bring in a band for all the services when an incumbent leaves, but equally you have to keep moving forward.

On a personal level, my Church workload, along with a number of other peoples workload goes up quite a lot during an interregnum. I have to say I’m really rather glad that I’m not one of the Churchwardens at this point, as they take a lot of the load on their shoulders. Being a Churchwarden and working full time is a lot of work in a normal year, but during a vacancy it would be nigh on impossible. In my current role as lay deputy chair of the PCC the main additional workload is being in the chair for PCC and Standing Committee meetings. It’s a bit dependant on the incumbent, but up to now although I’ve been lay  deputy chair of the PCC for a number of years, I’ve only ever actually chaired a meeting twice when Rev’d Richard was ill. Now I chair every single meeting until a new incumbent is in post.

There are also a number of extra meetings on the cards. One of the more complicated aspects of this interregnum is that the Diocese is taking the opportunity to do some pastoral reorganisation. Our neighbouring parish, St Mary and St John California is also in a vacancy following the retirement of their priest in charge in June. Their electoral roll is now such that in the current climate they would not get a full time incumbent, and ours is such that we are allowed to have two. Effectively what they are proposing to do is to merge the two parishes into one, and appoint two clergy to the parish. It is worth highlighting at this point that many years ago St Mary and St John started life as a daughter church of St James’ set up amongst the new housing that was being built to the north of the village. As that congregation grew ultimately it was separated and became a parish in it’s own right – not without some drama that I will not rake up here – and the church has been charting it’s own path for a number of years. However of late it has been between a resurgent St James’ and of late the brand new Finchampstead Baptist Church next door – the Baptists having seen increases of 40% in their congregations since opening the new building – St Mary and St John are facing some real challenges.

What is really important is that this mustn’t be some sort of ecclesiastical assimilation – some sort of take over. St Mary and St John are a very different congregation, and with very different goals and focus. For example St Mary and St John took the decision not to have a church building, and hold their services in the local school, whilst we at St James’ have just spent in excess of £0.5 million keeping our grade one listed building a safe and usable environment for our congregations.

Somehow the two PCC’s have to meld our very different vision and goals into a job spec and profile for whoever will come and be our new Rector and associate priest. There are big decisions about how closely the two congregations work together. It all begins with a joint PCC away day, but I’m sure it will be a long road ahead.

So here we stand at the beginning of the next stage of the journey. Various people keep hoping for a quick interregnum, but being realistic we’re looking at probably this time next year before we’ll be getting a new person in post. With working around school schedules for any priest with children, much as happened with Rev’d Richard, whilst we may appoint in the early part of 2011, if they are based outside the local area, they won’t be able to move before the summer. Hopefully then we will still be the vibrant and growing church we are now, ready to move on into the next era at St James’.