Modern Day War of the Worlds

Dave didn’t seem to like this – but this is what a modern day War of the Worlds set in Woking might look like.

I have to say, it is always quite strange when you read the War of the Worlds, with all the familiar local place names, because in some ways the places that H.G.Wells described back in 1898 have changed massively since then so as to in parts be totally unrecognisable to a modern reader. For example, Horsell the village outside Woking where in the book the first Martian landing takes place has been pretty well absorbed by the growth of the Woking housing estates over the twentieth century. Having said that, the 750 acres of Horsell Common itself has survived even if the surrounding area is rather different. Perhaps then you have to relocate the story elsewhere to produce a modern retelling…

Meet the Vatican Webmaster

In a rare item that ties the techie and Church themes on the blog, Robert Scoble posted a video of an interview with Sister Judith Zoebelein, Editorial director, Internet Office of the Holy See – essentially the nun behind the internet presence of the Vatican – a job she’s been doing since 1995!

The interview covers both technical aspects (the Vatican runs entirely with Unix and variations, including some of the team using Mac’s), and also more spiritual aspects, as the Catholic Church explores how it can use the internet both to improve communication in the Church across the globe, and also how the changing environment brought about by the Internet affects people. There are also some interesting comments about young people and online virtual worlds, and relating this back to the real world – trying to build real communities out of the virtual. Watch out too for discussion about the problems of relating modern technology to a two thousand year old organisation, and some interesting tit-bits about who in the Catholic Church is internet savvy!

The video runs for about 25 minutes, and is certainly a recommended watch, both for the techies, and also for those interested in how the Church is trying to relate to the new world online.

More Primate Meeting Comment

The Guardian and the BBC are playing catch-up somewhat with comment pieces today. The Guardian article pointing out that the result is not even really a compromise, and the BBC article fully expecting the Episcopal Church to go, together with Canada, Mexico, Brazil, most of Australia and New Zealand. Perhaps the only surprising part of the article is the idea that the Church of England would side with conservatives…

Anglican Primates Unanimously Agree that they Disagree

This picture is probably as near as you’re going to get to seeing a group shot of the Anglican Primates during the Primates meeting that occurred over the last week, a picture from the Eucharist held in the Cathedral in Zanzibar – and even then Archbishop Akinola wasn’t there after saying that he had a bad back.

Yesterday, the closing hours of the meeting proved to be the most dramatic in some ways, and perhaps ultimately the only part that went according to the script. But before that, things looked like they’d be rather different. Firstly came the quite amazing news that Katherine Jefferts Schori, who prior to the conference it was considered could be excluded, had been elected onto the Standing Committee. That was followed by the announcement of the Anglican Covenant, which seemed to go down better with the liberal wing of the Church. However, alongside this, the press conference for the final communiqué kept being pushed back. Dave Walker came up with his own reason as to why, but it seems that there was a good deal of last minute horse trading going on in order to try and get a communiqué to which everybody could unanimously agree – whilst the traditional group photograph didn’t take place, at least the primates were going to produce a unanimous statement!

Finally, they managed to do it. However it makes interesting reading. What is particularly telling is especially in the parts covering the controversy, the number of times the words “some of our numberâ€? or similar phrases are used – so in order to get everybody to sign, the communiqué in places ends up being a thinly disguised report on the disagreements. As reported by Stephen Bates, although the communiqué records the concerns both of the conservatives about same-sex blessings, and putting a moratorium on further appointments of gays to the episcopate, and also the liberal concerns over the conservative primates ignoring the Windsor report requirements that they not operate in other Anglican provinces, the big blow for the Episcopal Church is that it is given until 30th September to clarify it’s position, but the conservative Bishops can carry on as before – apparently the only way that Archbishop Akinola would sign. Having said that, it doesn’t actually propose a split within the Episcopal Church – effectively what is set up is similar to the Church within a Church that operates in the Church of England over women priests. Whilst it isn’t the predicted split, nor the predicted schism in the Anglican Communion – it does seem to only be postponing the inevitable – certainly if the anger expressed in some of the blog responses from liberal bloggers are anything to go by.

However, there are some interesting points about what was and wasn’t said in the communiqué that an Inclusive Church press release highlighted this afternoon. Chief among this was the perception that the Episcopal Church was being used as a scapegoat – the communiqué places requirements on them, but fails to mention the Canadian Anglican Church at all, nor indeed does it make any requirements on the Church of England, both of which have been the target of conservative anger in the recent past. Officially, the Church of England has no same sex blessings, and although they allow gay and lesbian clergy to enter into civil partnerships they are clear over celibacy – it is perfectly possible to find Church of England clergy who will provide a blessing, and it’s not exactly a secret. The situation in Canada is even more clear, indeed it was the well documented actions of the New Wesminster diocese – that officially approved a same sex blessing that in part initiated the current crisis. However, aside from one mention, the communiqué only targets the Episcopal Church.

So quite what happens now will probably not be clear until the dust has settled. I fully expect that even if the Bishops of Episcopal Church officially agree not to approve same sex blessing rites that the result will be a situation like we have in the Church of England. However I’m not totally sure that they will agree. If they don’t agree, I expect that come September, we might finally reach the point of schism, but if they do officially agree, then I’m sure we can expect another big row – and then we can look forward to the invitations for the Lambeth Conference in 2008 being issued, and the reaction from the different groups based on who gets invited. Unfortunately for the religious press pack who will follow the whole thing, this one will be in Kent, rather than a five-star tropical hotel…

So on we go – more arguments, more meetings, and more column inches. The end for stories about the Anglican Church? Sadly, not a chance.

But on the ground, life goes on. Whilst the press was covering the Anglican top brass, on the ground Church life went on as usual – for example Mum was leading a lay training session for her Diocese on the subject of God, Suffering and Death for which she has posted two sermons that she wrote in 2001 on which the session was based. As I mentioned earlier, members of the St James Choir were off helping out another local choir – and we’ll be back on duty again for Ash Wednesday tomorrow, and for a Musical Supper on Saturday night. Also our new bit of outreach, God@Work(@The Pub) held it’s third session at the Queens Oak, and over in the USA, Father Matthew takes a group of young people to the Cathedral of St John the Divine in New York. I’m quite sure that all over the world people will still be at Church on Sunday, and despite talk of schism and split, for most people in the pews, life goes on…

A full church originally uploaded by scottgunn.

The Plague of Nuisance Calls

Thanks to a combination of Anonymous Call Rejection and the Telephone Preference Service we’ve remained relatively free of nuisance sales calls. Unfortunately recently the numbers have picked up, firstly regular calls from 0800 183 0142 – many of which are silent, and also quite frequent international calls.

Taking them in reverse, the international calls are a total pain, as they bypass the Anonymous Call Rejection, as international calls don’t have an attached Caller ID details. It is also a pain as we quite legitimately get international calls from friends and family abroad. Having said that, as I mentioned a while back we’ve used Vonage to set up a Medicine Hat phone number, which since it is located in Canada, does get Canadian Caller ID, and even better passes this through when it rings in the UK, so this does mean that we can distinguish between the persistent foreign call centres, and legitimate calls.

The calls from 0800 183 0142 are somewhat more annoying though. The company making the calls RHL Ltd, who run call centres for a number of well known names including Sky, is as far as I am concerned complying with the letter of the Ofcom rules, but not the spirit. They are obliged to offer the freephone number, however, whenever we’ve had a silent call, we’ve dialled back the number, and it just connects to a recorded message apologising for the call, and says that there is nobody available to take the call. However this proves to be a bit of a lie. A little bit of digging on the internet turned up this discussion, which gives another phone number, 0141 272 1105, which was answered immediately – despite the message on the 0800 183 0142 number – and the person I spoke wasn’t in the least surprised when I asked for our number to be removed either. He took our details and the phone number to be removed, and assured us that the number would be removed from the automatic dialler within 24 hours.

The fact is that they are paid to sell, and whatever rubbish the Telemarketing industry may spout, I have yet to meet anybody who actually wants this cold calling – indeed with upwards of 48% of UK land line phone numbers now ex-directory it seems increasingly that we value our privacy on our home phone. If it were easy for people to remove themselves from the list, I imagine they’d have nobody to call, so whilst once you get through they are polite, they don’t make it quite as easy as it could be.

Ultimately what I want on my land line now is a feature I have on my mobile, whereby I can white list numbers – only the numbers I specify can get through, and everybody else has to leave a message. Unfortunately that seems to be a bit of a pipe dream, and it may require some more investigation of the VoIP options before I can get something like that working.

Update: Phoning the Glasgow number (0141 272 1105) rather than the 0800 183 0142 number that RHL put out as their Caller ID number has proved to have sorted the problem for now. We’ve had no more calls from that number. The international calls have also subsided – whether that was as a result of the call to RHL or just coincidence I don’t know. Having said that we have now picked up a cordless phone with built in Caller ID which allows us to not even answer the calls when they ring – even better we can just hit the hang up button and it cuts them straight off without us having to sit through the ringing – phone starts ringing, it’s an international or obvious sales number and we can hang up on them immediately. Lovely. 😀