Stephen Fry – Devices and Desires

I blogged a couple of years ago about an article about Stephen Fry that appeared in Mac Format and about his addiction to the Mac platform stretching back twenty years.

Recently Stephen has started a blog and the topic of his first posting – Devices and Desires – which discusses another technological addiction, mobile devices and Smartphones. Not surprisingly he has an iPhone, but this looks at the competition, most of which he has tried.

Style wise this is a bit different from your usual technical article – very Stephen Fry (so it does have a couple of more adult comments) – but it is a great read, and pretty funny in places. Incidentally as an example of the quirkiness, the title of the article is taken from the General Confession in the Book of Common Prayer (“I have followed too much the devices and desires of my own heartâ€?)- not a common point of reference for a computer article, but somewhat appropriate!

Looking at his history, it seems he is a Psion 3 fan whereas I only came in when the Psion 5 was launched. He’s tried Palm devices, but is very frustrated with the way they seem to regularly try to commit corporate suicide. He is particularly damning about the Palm Foleo, a mobile device even he did not want.

As an aside he also mentioned Markspace Missing Sync as a good way to synchronise a PocketPC with a Mac – not surprisingly after my nightmare with the product I can’t agree. Despite it’s numerous updates over recent months, I’m still not sure I actually trust it not to scramble my diary!

According to the article, he has tried a number of Symbian smartphones, and has some harsh words for Sony Ericsson:

What a crushing, lowering, fury-inducing disappointment. Just how dumb are the software engineers, designers and marketeers at Sony E?

On the other hand, he seems to quite like the latest Nokia offerings.

Moving on to the iPhone, he has many of the same criticisms as other techies and industry commentators – but again like quite a few in the US he is using the phone anyway.

What is quite impressive is that for a blog with only one article, Stephen Fry has so far had 140 comments – hopefully that will persuade him to write more as I for one will certainly be reading.

Drop it, Hide it, Lose it

The office across the road from us has been empty for the past couple of months – even when it was occupied they never used the delivery entrance I can see from the window. I’ve just watched a DHL driver come around to the back, stop in the middle of the road, ring the bell and then scan, sign for and leave propped up against the back door a parcel, before driving off.

Maybe I Should Just Keep My Mouth Shut…

I think perhaps I should just learn to keep my mouth shut at times!

One of the oldest and longest serving members of our choir has a bit of a bugbear about the text of Ave Verum, a short Eucharistic hymn from the 14th century that has been arranged by numerous composers, the most well known versions being those by Mozart and Elgar.

Her argument is with the final word, which in every version we have is “examineâ€? – but which she maintains should be “exanimeâ€?. Every time we sing a version of Ave Verum we go through a protracted argument where she tries to persuade our Director of Music that from her university studies of Latin every version of the hymn is wrong, and we should sing it the right way. She has on several occasions maintained that the difference is to enable the words to rhyme. What usually happens is we go through this discussion, and usually end up singing it the way it is written.

Last time it came up, it bugged me enough that I took the time to look it up, in particular looking to see if there is any sort of controversy over the last word. Interestingly, I did find something, but this was discussing whether the text should be “mortis in examine� or “in mortis examine�, but no query over the word “examine�. I also found the entry on ChoralWiki which presents the original Latin with translations into a selection of other languages, but still no discussion of any issue with the final word. I even tried searching for the final line with the suggested final word, but nothing came up.

Then I turned up this blog posting which discusses differences in versions, and spends a lot of time on the final line, and especially highlights the difficulties in translating the final line. It also states that “examine� is the ablative form of the noun “examen�.

Anyway, tonight we started learning a new version of Ave Verum, this time by Saint-Saëns, and we got to “examineâ€? and the same discussion started. Our Director of Music started to give in and say that maybe we should sing “exanimeâ€?, at which point I said that I’d looked it up and as far as I was concerned “examineâ€? was correct according to the original text.

At that point our long standing choir member nearly exploded, and I got all of the usual arguments directed at me, but I held my line that I’d looked it up and that the use of “examineâ€? was correct according to all the musical and liturgical sources I could find. This seemed to bolster our Director of Music who said that we would do it as written – this produced a most amazing scene from the other choir member who quite literally threw her copy down and refused to sing unless we sang it the “right wayâ€?. Our Director of Music pretty well ignored her for the next few minutes, and then perhaps unwisely suggested that it probably wasn’t that important anyway… That not surprisingly produced another outburst. By this point I was trying to hide away as much as I could in the back row.

Having said that, on a positive note, my saying what I did, did seem to curtail any further discussion on the topic, and certainly avoided the grumbles we get from elsewhere in the choir if it is decided that we sing “exanimeâ€? instead – although quite what the fallout will be from our long standing member I don’t know. I wasn’t exactly expecting quite the explosion I actually got – if I had thought I was going to get that I wouldn’t have opened my mouth…