Tag Archives: Results

Five Things You Would Have Seen Today

Today was A-Level results day, so during the day on TV and in the media you probably saw this:

  1. A carefully selected “representative cross section” of students, pre-checked to ensure they get good results of course, to open their A-Level Results live on TV.
  2. Newspapers and newspaper web sites with lots of pictures of carefully selected groups of girls leaping excitedly having got their A-Level results – hey look here are loads and loads of them.
  3. Pundits saying that A-Levels are easier than they were in the past, heightened this year by the arrival of the new A* grade because too many people are now getting A grades.
  4. Politicians highlighting that the results are a triumph for their policies better educating our children, or alternatively an indication of the failure of the other lots policies and a fall in standards.
  5. Lots of advice on what to do if you didn’t get your grades and have to go through clearing.

I probably should have written this list yesterday, because the whole results day routine is depressingly familiar. The media do the same thing every year – in fact they do the same thing on almost every Thursday in August every year as the different exam results come out on different weeks. This year was amusing by the appearance of theĀ Sexy A-Levels blog, which highlights that unlike the TV channels who have to show a representative cross-section of students – so you get a mixture of boys and girls, a couple from an ethnic minority and so on – the impression that you get from the newspapers is that most A-Level students are overwhelmingly white, young and pretty girls.

This year the annual “A-Levels have got easier” discussion was boosted by the arrival of the new A* grade which was needed to distinguish the increasing numbers of students getting an A grade – certainly if you look at the graph of percentage of students awarded an A grade on the graph on this BBC News story the growth is striking, even compared to when I took my A-Levels back in 1991. Having said that, the difficult thing about any comparison like that is the effect it has on the young people today. There may be more people getting the top grade, but they still have to work hard to achieve those grades, so it is important to try to have the debate without denigrating their achievement. Having said that, not least from the point of view of people who have to distinguish between applicants, whether that be for university or job applications, there needs to be more delineation. The A* grade helps, but it does seem a bit like adding an extra large to a range of sizes, whilst simultaneously making all the other sizes slightly smaller.

All of that aside, I know some young people who have achieved the grades they needed, and are now excitedly looking towards starting at university in the autumn, many congratulations to them. I also know a few who missed out on what they needed, and are even now trying to work out what to do, and going through the stress of clearing, to them commiseration’s, but don’t feel downhearted – I also know plenty of people who had similar results, and whilst it seemed like the end of the world at the time, came through it, and in a number of cases said it was probably a good thing in the long run, taking them places that they weren’t expecting. Whatever happened, good results or not so good, it is a big change for everybody, and I’d just like to wish everybody who got their results today good luck for the future.

Exam Result Time

So we’re now into the traditional period of the summer where the exam results are published – GCSE, A-Level and SATs – and the media runs endless negative stories. In fact you can actually write the news items ahead of the results, all you need is a “Falling Standards” article for if the pass rates go down, and an “Exams are getting easier” article for if they go up.

Having said that, yesterdays SATs results did both, with English and Science going up, but Maths falling – so guess which one is the headline

The TV News, alongside the Daily Telegraph have also run headlines about “Four in 10 pupils ‘failing basics” (although the news went for 40%) based on a combined “3R’s” (although the Daily Telegraph writer doesn’t seem to be able to grasp counting to three as elsewhere in the article he says it is “made up of results in reading and writing”) – however when you look at it alongside the other figures there is something odd going on, as all of the individual categories are between 71% and 76%, and yet the combined result is 60% – needless to say the media organisations aren’t bothering to explain how this combined total is calculated…

The bottom line is that invariably the results are used by politicians as a stick to beat each other with – the current party in power will argue that standards are improving, the opposition that they are falling. They were doing it twenty years ago when I was going through the education system, and they are still doing it now. The only difference is that when I was at school the party in power was different.

So how do the politicians deal with improving standards? They change the curriculum, and it’s not that they change the curriculum for new pupils either, it gets changed for pupils who are already going through the process. For example when I was at school the History curriculum changed several times, putting different periods at different points, so I did some periods of history three times, and others not at all.

The whole increasing standards is crazy anyway, as by increasing the numbers of pupils achieving top grades, it has now resulted in needing A+ and A++ grades to differentiate pupils. Isn’t that just like McDonald’s renaming their drinks sizes from small, medium and large to medium, large and extra-large? The universities are interested in the top performing students, so are requiring comparison with the other pupils taking an exam – essentially they want bell curve grading – the politicians want to see rising standards, but using a simplistic measure that is easy to understand, so they go for the numbers achieving A-C grades – however the bell curve is steadily being shifted by the simplistic indication of rising standards, so in the A+ and A++ suggestion means that there would be five grade levels in the recorded band rather than the three there were when I was at school.

Wouldn’t it be easier to keep a consistent curriculum and consistent exam system? Probably, but since one of the stated aims of the National Curriculum is to “prepare all pupils for the … experiences of life” going through an education system where the rules are continuously being changed by politicians is going to be one of the most valuable lessons for life experience!