Apprentice Deja Vu

It was a definite case of deja vu on the Apprentice this week. In a repeat from Adam last week, we had Ghazal, one of the boardroom survivors who had begged to be project manager in order to prove themselves getting her wish, and again the gamble not paying off. To be fair, this was the advertising task, which thanks to the very limited time-scales involved is always notoriously difficult and unrealistic.

Effectively you have a few hours from cold to come up with a product, and then in two days have to produce a billboard advert and a TV advertisement. The product this year was a trainer – for which the teams had to come up with a brand and associated campaign.

Neither team did overly well – unfortunately the team difficulties came into play and yet again, Stealth lost as they effectively divided into two, and in another deja vu moment the fired candidate, who this time around had been relying on Katie throughout the task, admitted that she saw her in a whole new light having seen all of the rest of the footage in the programmes.

simon-splits_358×265.jpg

The most entertaining part of the episode was probably the Tre/Simon double act. The team had come up with a ‘reclaim the street’ concept for their campaign, which aimed to tie in to street culture. Unfortunately the limited choice of actors for the advert couldn’t provide the requisite dance skills. Luckily Cambridge graduate Simon proved to be multi-talented – well maybe it would be fairer to say that he was willing to try his hand at anything. He wrote and recorded the rap for the advert, and then volunteered to do the dancing. However through all of it Tre, who had come up with the concept got increasingly frustrated at the quality of the rap, and the lack of good dancers, leading to a number of amusing Tre-isms to camera.

Katie continued to dominate the other team. As a Global Brand Consultant this seemed like an ideal task for Katie, but despite her presence, and also with Naomi having relevant experience, the team failed to come up with a decent concept. Kristina and Naomi got increasingly frustrated, making a pretty obvious split with Katie and Ghazal. Unfortunately that left Katie running the team by proxy, to the extent that Katie later persuaded Ghazal to change the concept mere minutes before the other two team members headed off to film the advert and take the pictures. Despite producing a good looking advert and poster shot, it couldn’t make up for the lack of concept, which was quickly spotted by both Alan Sugar and the advertising agency.

Katie again was called into the boardroom but largely sat back whilst the other two, Naomi and Ghazal argued. Sugar however picked her up on this, at which point amazingly she seemed to be trying to flirt her way out of trouble – not that it got her very far – Sugar pointed out that she’d been on the loosing side six times out of eight, and what a lousy record this was. Interestingly after protesting for a while, she then tried the ‘give me a chance, make me project leader’ gamble that has been tried by Adam and Ghazal in the previous two weeks. Will it be the same outcome? We’ll have to wait and see…

As to potential winners, I’m not sure. Katie certainly seems to have annoyed Sir Alan enough that she won’t make it. Tre is probably too much of a hot-head too, even if he does survive longer. Naomi and Kristina are possibilities, and Simon seems universally popular amongst his fellow candidates and able to turn his hand to almost anything along with it. I have to say that Lohit is probably still my favourite, not least because he just quietly gets on with things – you can read more about his time on the show on his website. But then what do I know – Sugar very much follows his own path with his choices, so it may well still be a total surprise who he picks in a few weeks time.

A Hotel that Does Read the Feedback Forms

After Jo and Drew’s Wedding last week, rather than drive back home we spent the night in another local hotel, the Richmond Gate Hotel. Basically the choice was somewhat limited when we booked as I wanted a hotel where we could actually park the car – a number of the hotels in Richmond have little or no car parking at all – and the Richmond Gate was about it.

You can read my review of the hotel on TripAdvisor, what I wrote on there is pretty much what I put on the feedback form. Looking at the other reviews for the hotel, and also for it’s sister hotel next door for both the experience does seem to depend very much on which room you get.

In terms of the Richmond Gate there are rooms in the nice Georgian part at the front of the building, but the majority of the rooms are in the modern three-storey block out the back where we were – and they charge extra for the bigger ‘feature’ rooms anyway. Being a modern design though, all of the standard rooms in the block out the back are the same size – small. Looking on the hotel’s website some of these do appear to have been refurbished, but they won’t have been able to do that much about the size of the rooms. They could shrink the bathroom, but that won’t do that much good really as fundamentally I think the basic room is small for the amount they are charging, however many toys they try to add.

So whilst there was nothing overly wrong with our stay, I thought it was expensive for what we got. The room was small, and basically a bit tatty as it had yet to be refurbished. I filled in the form, but didn’t much expect a response. However a couple of days ago I actually got a letter from the manager at the hotel apologising for the room and highlighting that they were refurbishing the rooms, and that our room hadn’t been done yet and offering us a complimentary upgrade to a superior room the next time we stay there in the next year – not that I think we’ll have call to use it though… But it’s nice to know somebody reads those things.

The Richmond Gate Hotel originally uploaded by justindz – who also thought the rooms were small…

At Least we Didn’t Come Last…

Another Eurovision, and another block vote spectacular!

_42917943_scooch_afp203b.jpg

For a long while it looked as though the UK was heading for a repeat of their ‘nul points’ performance by Jemini in the 2003 contest. In the end a grand total of two out of the forty-two voting countries actually gave us points – the two countries that most often give us points, 7 points from Ireland, and top marks, a 12 from Malta. Ironically it was the Irish vote that relegated their own entry to last place.

Ironically, considering the mess when our song was selected, when Scooch ultimately won, the second placed song was a big ballad, and that is what won – a big ballad from Serbia. Having said that, whatever we would have put forward, I would have been surprised if we had come that much higher. Most of the western European countries were knocked out in the semi-final, and those that remained, including the big four who automatically qualify – the UK, Germany, France and Spain – were all in the bottom six.

There was a real eclectic mix of styles this time around, with glam rock from Sweeden, a German swing number, and traditional Irish folk (that came last with only Albania giving them any points at all). There was a definite Lordi effect though, with a noticeable increase in the more hard rock numbers.

However what I suspect will garner most complaints this year as in a number of recent years will be the block voting. Whilst in the past, it used to be quite amusing that Greece and Cyprus would always vote for each other for example, it didn’t seem to have that much of an effect. With the break up of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, large parts of the voting appeared to be being affected by these block votes tonight – indeed even the UK votes were from our traditional block with Ireland and Malta. However it was noticeable that on several occasions the audience in Finland booed 12 point votes that appeared to be blatantly political. Short of changing the voting system though, there is not really anything that can be done. Perhaps the only way we in the UK can increase our chances is to enter as four separate countries – England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales – rather than the United Kingdom – then at least we can all vote for each other to increase our votes…

Update: A couple of related news items. Firstly, Malta have all but accused some of the other countries of cheating in the phone vote, plus parts of the German media are unhappy and demanding that Germany withdraw from the competition, and secondly, British MP’s are demanding changes to the voting system, or that the BBC withdraw from subsequent contests. Certainly it will be interesting to see quite what will happen if two of the big four broadcasters who bankroll the competition pull out…

How to Loose by 97p

tx7-adam-main_358×265.jpg

Last week on The Apprentice, Adam in part survived the boardroom with a plea to let him be project manager the next time to prove himself. True it gave him one more chance, but unfortunately the gamble didn’t pay off, and he found himself on the loosing side by a grand total of 97p.

This weeks task was a Sugar favourite where each team is given identical lists of items, and have to obtain them for the cheapest amount possible. As a task it tests a variety of skills including negotiation and time management.

It is also covered by some fairly strict rules. Firstly, the only source of information is the Yellow Pages – so specifically you can’t go looking things up on the internet, even thought the teams have internet capable smart-phones. Secondly, you have to negotiate the price down, you can’t go with the initial asking price. Thirdly, if you fail to obtain one of the items, the team will be fined £50 plus the estimate value of the item. Finally, if any members of the team return to the boardroom after the 6pm deadline, the team will be fined £50.

Both teams picked up fines, Eclipse for failing to negotiate on a price – for one item the trader refused to meet their price, but offered them a batch of seconds at a fixed price which they accepted, and Stealth for failing to obtain one of the items. Bear in mind that they did have a supplier for the item, but couldn’t get there and back in time for the 6pm deadline. Of course if they had remembered the rules and realised that the fine would be less for arriving late, they would have won… Hindsight is a wonderful thing! Ironically the reason that they left it so late was because of the item on the list to catch the teams out – Nigella Seeds. They are known by a number of different names, and with a few moments on the internet you can look up the different names, however without the internet both teams were left scratching their heads as to what they actually were. There were some truly bizarre suggestions put forward, including Adam suggesting that they were something to do with artificial football pitches!

Ultimately though, once it was clear that stealth had lost, it was a foregone conclusion that Adam was going to go, as this was his fourth successive visit to the boardroom. Unfortunately I think this was a little unfair. Whilst the first and fourth times were due to him being project manager, the intervening two visits were as much to do with Adam not being liked by the other candidates. This came out again in the boardroom with Katie in particular making it absolutely clear that she wanted him gone. As before, she saved the really venomous comments for the one-to-one interviews, this weeks alienating a large part of the country by saying that Adam should head back to the north – snobbish? Certainly seems that way. There was also the interesting alliance of Katie and Kristina who put aside their differences as far as Adam was concerned in order to get rid of him. Quite how long the truce will last remains to be seen.

Interestingly, even though it was pretty clear that Adam was likely to go, not least for the decision not to go and get the Nigella Seeds, it did seem like there was a possibility that Sugar could give Katie the boot instead. This is the first time she has been in the boardroom, and if she is even half as unpopular as she is with most of the general public, I definitely think she’ll be on the way out – Sugar made a number of comments about needing to think about how the winner will fit into his organisation – certainly being too forceful has been shown in the past to thoroughly put him off.

Anyway, it’s a bit of a change of tack next week, with an advertising task. A repeat of the hilarity of the private jet task last year? We’ll have to wait and see. In the mean time, as Adam has said on every appearance since he was sacked, he is looking for a job – check out his website at www.adamhosker.co.uk.

Wedding Pictures

The Waiting is Over

If you’ve been reading Beth’s blog recently you’ll have been following her making the cake for Jo and Drew’s wedding which took place yesterday.

She has actually written up the day, well it’s actually about fifty-percent about the cakes, but there are details from the wedding too!

If you’re wondering about the comment about my foot – which I realise I haven’t mentioned on here, at the moment I’ve got an infection in my left foot, which I’ve had since the beginning of the week. The doctor said it was either an infection, or could be gout – saying that if it were gout the pain would be worse later in the week as the antibiotics he gave me would be ineffective. Anyway, the good news is that it isn’t more painful, so hopefully it’s not gout, but the bad news is that with it being in my left foot changing gear in the car is rather uncomfortable, as is wearing anything other than a slipper on that foot, so Beth did the driving yesterday.

Anyway, I’ve uploaded the pictures that I took yesterday to Flickr, or alternatively you can browse them in our gallery.