Tag Archives: Travel

Flying

767-300.jpg

First off, a bit of good news to all of our friends who have got one of my moans over about the past week about the complications of trying to book our next trip to Canada – you’ll be pleased to hear that we’ve now actually booked a trip, so no more moans – well at least not about this! 😀

The problem has been trying to find a reasonably priced flight that fitted in with when we wanted to go. Now there are two competing airlines flying the London to Calgary route I foolishly assumed that it might make the fares more competitive – no such luck, Air Canada were doing their usual mickey take on prices, and the new competition, British Airways were coming back with fares of over £2000 return for both of us to go over on the dates we wanted. I then moved onto Canadian Affair, who are usually pretty good, but they are still running their winter schedule when we were looking, and the only options they had were some seats on a Monarch flight, which whilst it is cheap is a 29“ seat pitch which whilst it is fine for Beth would be torture for me, or a couple of their once a week Air Transat flights that would have significantly cut the length of the trip.

Anyway, the breakthrough came when I tried looking up flights into Edmonton rather than Calgary. In the past it’s not really ever been an option – certainly the only times I’ve flown into Edmonton it has involved a plane change at Calgary, and a trip on the little turbo-prop service that shuttles backwards and forwards between the two cities. However now, alongside the twice daily service to Calgary, Air Canada have added a daily service into Edmonton – and significantly at a rather cheaper cost than the equivalent trip into Calgary.

At this point the vagaries of how airlines actually work out their flight costs really starts to get confusing. Looking at the seating plans for the Edmonton flights, they don’t look any less full than those into Calgary – the journey to Edmonton is marginally shorter granted, but in the grand scheme of things not by much, but the cost of the tickets we were being offered was noticeably less than what was being offered into Calgary. Actually if you really want to confuse yourself, try coming up with a reason why it’s cheaper to fly to Toronto and then on to Calgary than take the direct flight – longer flying time, more fuel used, but still cheaper.

Having got some idea of the costs I then tried to put together the best deal – and discovered that since their take-over by Air Transat, Canadian Affair are really not keen on booking flights with Air Canada – and that was after we’d been through the usual routine over my insisting that we needed to book the car rental with Hertz. (For the reasons why, check out this post about car rental companies and their definitions of â€?off-road driving“.) Thankfully I’ve now discovered that Opodo, unlike Expedia and Travelocity do have a deal with Hertz so I can build a reasonable package with them without too much trouble.

The one final oddity when we were booking on Opodo was down to the BMI codeshare on the flight – as usual the same physical flight was listed twice at different prices – however even more odd, the BMI version of the flight had only four seats left, whilst the Air Canada version had availability marked as â€?good“ – indeed if you look at the flight using the Air Canada reservation system online the flight is only about half full. I’m guessing that there are only a limited number of codeshare seats available – although as it’s all going through the same booking system I can’t imagine it’s too difficult to allow any of the seats on the plane to be sold through any of the codeshare partners.

Anyway all of that aside, after a bit of comparing, we’ve eventually opted to fly in and out of Edmonton on Air Canada for this trip. Even including the cost of the car rental and a hotel for the first night we are there it still worked out cheaper than flying into Calgary!

Quoted in the Sunday Times

If you look carefully in the travel section of yesterdays Sunday Times, you’ll see what can happen if you grumble about something on your blog – in this case the spectacularly misnamed ‘Fast Bag Drop’ at Heathrow. The target of the article is the British Airways operation, however the Air Canada equivalent at the airport is no better.

Steve Bleach, the reporter in question sent me an e-mail last week. He’d had a pretty hellish attempt at dropping off the bags on his last transatlantic flight (at least we didn’t have to keep children entertained in the queue when we had to wait), and decided to write an item about it in the paper, and thought he’d have a search online and see if anyone else had problems. He’d come across a number of postings, including ours. Basically I called him back, and we shared ‘Fast Bag Drop’ chaos stories, part of which is quoted in the paper. Certainly from that article it seems that the situation is no better at Gatwick.

Anyway, things are no better when you get to the other end either – check out this clip of the sight that greeted a passenger trying to collect his luggage in Las Vegas…

Airline Seat Recline

One of the articles I added to my link blog yesterday, was an article by Mike Davidson, a frequent flyer, over Aeroplane Seat Etiquette, particularly the effect of the recline on the people behind, brought about by an experience on a recent flight. This particular trip he had wanted to do some work, and even with a 12-inch Powerbook, with the person in front having fully reclined their seat, he couldn’t get into a position where he could see the screen.

Indeed, it is much the same sort of problem that I commented on in my United Airlines posting with regards to the seat-back screens, and a problem I saw repeated in a number of places in the economy cabin on my trip. Indeed there are now companies marketing gadgets that allow you to stop the seat in front reclining alongside a discussion of etiquette. It is interesting to note the heated discussion that Mike’s article has provoked, particularly over what he chose to do to his fellow passenger, and also the vote he is running on the site over how many will recline whoever is behind, certainly seems to reflect the estimate of the number of times he has problems.

Ultimately though, the problem is down to airlines, and their designs and cabin layouts. Whilst the lack of recline on Ryanair is as much down to saving costs as passenger comfort, in general the airlines are looking to cram as many people in as possible, and every extra bit of space they give is lost potential profit. Of course many offer Premium Economy services, but a quick look at the prices is enough to see that you often pay a significant premium for the extra space. Ultimately though, you are left with using sites like Seat Guru and their tables of legroom to try and find the best seat you can, as unless there is a change of attitude in the industry, or even more unlikely some sort of legislation, maybe as a result of DVT campaigns, I doubt anything will change.

Update: The seat recline debate has reached the Wall Street Journal.

Security Alert

So today the news is filled with the latest security alert – following ‘disruption’ of a potential plot to blow up an aircraft in flight. Of course as with most of these alerts, solid information is minimal. There are numbers of people arrested, but the rest is largely speculation from all the various experts turning up on the 24-hour news channels.

Current speculation includes that the plot involved some sort of explosive liquid – based on the fact that only baby milk is being allowed on to planes, and even then it has to be taste tested.
The main result of the alert is massive disruption at airports as the levels of searching have been increased, plus everybody is having to check their cabin baggage – the only thing they can carry are essential documents and medicines in a clear plastic bag.

I have to say that on the one hand I’m expecting this to be much the same as the previous big alerts, when for example we had tanks outside Heathrow, in that after the initial chaos, it will all be forgotten, and things will go pretty well back to normal. However what is causing some discussion are the advantages of the new policy on hand baggage. Somehow, a flight where everybody has a single small bag, rather than the scrum of oversized luggage boarding and leaving a plane, or the time it takes to search all the bags at security being reduced because everybody is limited to a single clear bag all seems rather appealing after some experiences I’ve had.

Update: The Register has a pretty thought provoking opinion article looking at the reaction from the US authorities to our new security measures.

On the Road

Steamy Shower Warning

So tonight I’m spending the night in the Mill Hotel in the centre of Chester.

The hotel isn’t bad, especially compared to some of the places I stayed at when I was at SSE – the wing I am in is pretty new, and even has a network connection in the room (hence how I’m able to blog). The hotel seems to be pretty well non-smoking, although there is a quite amusing sign on the door of the bathroom – apparently steamy showers will set of the fire alarms. 😀

The food so far has been good too, have to wait and see what breakfast is like.

In fact the only annoyance is the TV. Like most hotels it has a universal remote to control the TV, and as in a number of places before, the universal remote has been deprogrammed. Also as in most UK hotels I’ve been in, the channel arrangement is pretty odd. BBC1 is up at channel 17, BBC 2, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 are in slots 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The rest of the channels is the usual odd mix of channels that you often get in hotels, with News 24, Sky Three, Sky Sports, and a couple of other channels coming of a shared Sky box. Anyway, I just need to remember how to set the alarm on my phone now, and finish off at the customer tomorrow before heading home.